 |
Goodpasture Confidential A Confidential Place for Parents, Students and Employees
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
JohnHarris Site Admin
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 1152 Location: Nashville
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 3:46 pm Post subject: Goodpasture's Lawyer threatens site to shut down or else! |
|
|
One of the reports about the recent PTO meeting indicated that the school made its presentation but did not want to answer questions from the floor. That is a systemic problem at Goodpasture, no one wants to be open and honest about the issues or to publicly respond to the questions that parents, students and faculty have.
Instead, Goodpasture operates on intimidation, threats and secrets in my opinion.
In that light, it has been rumored for months that Goodpasture and its attorneys were looking into their options on how to shut up the discussion on this site. On September 26, 2007, Goodpasture once again had its attorneys (Bone McAllister law firm) send a letter.
This time the school's attorneys (how much is the board really authorizing) demanded that this web site (which some might claim is a "gripe site" but which in reality is directed more towards identifying and solving problems at the school) be taken off line by October 2, 2007.
Bone McAllister Letter of September 26, 2007
I responded also on September 26, 2007, pointing out that the statutes that were referenced in the letter pertain to commercial uses and that non-commercial uses generally constitute protected First Amendment free speech.
Harris reply dated September 26, 2007
As with many issues discussed on this site, I want to provide relevant information so that you can determine what is right and fair and what is not. Generally, the law provides that "gripe sites" such as "IHateDell" or "WalMartSucks" are consumer/employee sites that contain protected First Amendment comments about employers, businesses, and even schools. As a general rule, these types of sites are not illegal.
Here are several links of interest on this topic:
Public Citizen, a watchdog group that protects the rights of citizens and consumers, has handled extensive litigation in this area. See Public Citizen on Gripe Sites
Likewise, these Internet Library of Law and Court Decisions has information about other situations where businesses/schools have tried to squash free speech in an effort to limit the amount of truthful information being distributed about their problems and practices. See Internet Law Library
There is a nonprofit organization which helps to protect the First Amendment rights of sites such as this. That organization is called FIRE and it focuses primarily on efforts, such as that made by Goodpasture, directed by colleges and universities.
Based upon the issues that now exist, I remain of the belief that this site and its content is protected First Amendment speech. It is not commercial speech. It raises issues, discloses facts and asks questions about Goodpasture but there is no realistic way it could be seen as "competing" for students since that is not the site's mission or purpose as so clearly stated in so many places and posts.
What this school has needed and still needs are people who are willing to stand up and demand that things be done right, that parents get what they are paying for and that they not be mislead or outright lied to as some believed has happened at least with respect to the "band parents meetings."
At this time, I am not planning to take the site down until and unless the school can show me specific case law which states that it is illegal for parents, alumni, donors, faculty, students and others to ask questions and make statements about their school in a public discussion. How do you feel? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wonder how much of my tuition money went into that little ruckus.
Based on the improved publicity of the band, students' news letter, cougar paw web site, improved food services, and cleaned up language by teachers in the class room, it seems to me the parents and students of GCS are getting a lot of good out of this site.
You caused more good changes at GCS in less than a year than Gil has done in 3 1/2 years.
Keep up the good work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They are so despirate to shut you up but the site is having such a positive impact on the changes at the school. What is next? Are the going to hire some bully to beat you up.
First Amendment is right! We are paying good money and we have a right to say what we feel and to hear what others say.
I think its great that it is irritating them to make more changes.
Do not take this site down. It is a shame there is a need for it but there is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This despirate and futile action by the administration is predictable. They cannot truthfully prove that the things being said here are not true so they must try to close the site instead. All this tells me is that there is more that they are hiding that they do not want us to know about because it must be even worse than what has already been put here.
Keep it up and maybe things will be better at the school than they are now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
82grad
Joined: 10 Jun 2007 Posts: 7 Location: Nashville
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hilarious! John, I didn't read all of your post, but I did get the main point...FREE SPEECH.
They so want us to just go away. Will they ever get it? They can't look past the fact that they can't control something. They can't just ignore it like they seem to be ignoring major issues at the school. Kinda pathetic of them, if you ask me!
If only they'd spend the same time and money actually coming up with solutions for GCS instead of in a room huddled with their lawyers, maybe there wouldn't be a NEED for this site!
Go, John! Don't you dare take this site down (I know you won't).  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnHarris Site Admin
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 1152 Location: Nashville
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good summary 82Grad.
I have invited the school repeatedly to demonstrate or provide to me information that establishes that any of the information contained here is not true or no longer true. A great example of that is the huge storm cloud about the school's status as a charity or not. I have established that the process to obtain 501(c)(3) status could have easily been completed in the time that has past since the issue was raised. I have never suggested that the school would not qualify for status - only that it does not have it according to a letter from the IRS dated early this spring. Yet here we are starting the last quarter of 2007 and rather than putting facts on the table the school is trying to make threats and intimidation.
Ultimately, perhaps they will get what they are asking for. It was a huge mistake for Gil Drake to challenge Jim Reed's application for unemployment benefits because by doing that he had to testify under oath and his testimony reveals both irreconcilable statements compared to what he told the band parents and his incompetence in administration. What do you think will happen if they file suit to shut down this site and I get the chance to start taking sworn depositions of Gil, Dianne, Lindsey, Ms. Smith and Board Members and those depositions then get posted here as well? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| JohnHarris wrote: | | What do you think will happen if they file suit to shut down this site and I get the chance to start taking sworn depositions of Gil, Dianne, Lindsey, Ms. Smith and Board Members and those depositions then get posted here as well? |
Well, for one thing, I will rent a billboard on nearby I-65 and have
goodpastureconfidential.com
printed on it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| What about some of those boards that people put in the beds of pickup trucks at election time. It would be less costly and mobile. We could drive them all over, to away games, to band contests, to church. It would be great to see the thumbs up all over town that I know would be there, well except out in front of Gil and Dianne's houses. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DavidLewis
Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 114
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 9:18 am Post subject: Re: Goodpasture's Lawyer threatens site to shut down or else |
|
|
| JohnHarris wrote: | | At this time, I am not planning to take the site down until and unless the school can show me specific case law which states that it is illegal for parents, alumni, donors, faculty, students and others to ask questions and make statements about their school in a public discussion. How do you feel? |
Oh, good grief!
What's next? Are they gonna claim that alumni can't use the term "Goodpasture" when asked "Where did you go to high school?" On a resume? A job application? Casual conversation?
Makes me want to jump up & down shouting "Goodpasture!" [thinly veiled Monty Python reference]
What are they gonna do, revoke our diplomas!?! Shades of Mr. Bridgeman!
David _________________ David Lewis
Class of 1978 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnHarris Site Admin
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 1152 Location: Nashville
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
It appears that the school has attempted to register the name "Goodpasture" on AUGUST 31 2007 which clearly indicates that this was done solely to lay a factual basis for this demand letter dated September 26, 2007.
Tennessee Trademark Search Results
Note that the school is claiming that they started using the name on September 30, 1964. However, according to the Secretary of State business corporations online date, the "assumed" name of Christian Schools, Inc. (the name of the school as originally chartered in 1964 and its legal name still) whereby apparently Goodpasture was adopted was not until 2005.
Obviously, it was called Goodpasture in the 1970's when I was there. I do not know exactly when the name came on but the school's proper name is still Christian Schools, Inc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnHarris Site Admin
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 1152 Location: Nashville
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 9:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
This summary might help some of you who are wondering about these trademark assertions by the school
| Quote: |
Question: What are the limits of trademark rights?
Answer: There are many limits, including:
* Fair Use
There are two situations where the doctrine of fair use prevents infringement:
1. The term is a way to describe another good or service, using its descriptive term and not its secondary meaning. The idea behind this fair use is that a trademark holder does not have the exclusive right to use a word that is merely descriptive, since this decreases the words available to describe. If the term is not used to label any particular goods or services at all, but is perhaps used in a literary fashion as part of a narrative, then this is a non-commercial use even if the narrative is commercially sold.
2. Nominative fair use
This is when a potential infringer (or defendant) uses the registered trademark to identify the registrant’s product or service in conjunction with his or her own. To invoke this defense, the defendant must prove the following elements:
o his/her product or service cannot be readily identified without pointing to the registrant’s mark
o he/she only uses as much of the mark as is necessary to identify the goods or services
o he/she does nothing with the mark to suggest that the registrant has given his approval to the defendant
* Parody Use
Parodies of trademarked products have traditionally been permitted in print and other media publications. A parody must convey two simultaneous -- and contradictory -- messages: that it is the original, but also that it is not the original and is instead a parody.
* Non-commercial Use
If no income is solicited or earned by using someone else's mark, this use is not normally infringement. Trademark rights protect consumers from purchasing inferior goods because of false labeling. If no goods or services are being offered, or the goods would not be confused with those of the mark owner, or if the term is being used in a literary sense, but not to label or otherwise identify the origin of other goods or services, then the term is not being used commercially.
* Product Comparison and News Reporting
Even in a commercial use, you can refer to someone else’s goods by their trademarked name when comparing them to other products. News reporting is also exempt.
* Geographic Limitations
A trademark is protected only within the geographic area where the mark is used and its reputation is established. For federally registered marks, protection is nationwide. For other marks, geographical use must be considered. For example, if John Doe owns the mark Timothy’s Bakery in Boston, there is not likely to be any infringement if Jane Roe uses Timothy’s Bakery to describe a bakery in Los Angeles. They don't sell to the same customers, so those customers aren't confused.
* Non-competing or Non-confusing Use
Trademark rights only protect the particular type of goods and services that the mark owner is selling under the trademark. Some rights to expansion into related product lines have been recognized, but generally, if you are selling goods or services that do not remotely compete with those of the mark owner, this is generally strong evidence that consumers would not be confused and that no infringement exists. This defense may not exist if the mark is a famous one, however. In dilution cases, confusion is not the standard, so use on any type of good or service might cause infringement by dilution of a famous mark.
http://www.chillingeffects.org/trademark/faq.cgi#QID56
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DavidLewis
Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 114
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 10:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| JohnHarris, in a quote, wrote: | | Trademark rights protect consumers from purchasing inferior goods because of false labeling. |
Hmmm...
Maybe they should be careful in the use of the word "Christian", then.
David _________________ David Lewis
Class of 1978 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Seems to me (and of course I'm no lawyer) that this trademark application wouldn't apply here because it was begun in August of this year, while this site was begun over a year ago. Isn't something of a "grandfather" clause applicable? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Can John trademark the name Goodpasture Confidential, then? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dottie Guest
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:22 pm Post subject: GCS |
|
|
| After Elvis Presley's name had a trademark, no one else could use it, and the ones that had used it prior to the trademark had to stop using it. What a trademark does is to protect. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnHarris Site Admin
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 1152 Location: Nashville
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:33 pm Post subject: Re: GCS |
|
|
| Dottie wrote: | | After Elvis Presley's name had a trademark, no one else could use it, and the ones that had used it prior to the trademark had to stop using it. What a trademark does is to protect. |
True, but the protections are limited. Trademark, in the context of this type of discussion, is not applicable. The First Amendment is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnHarris Site Admin
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 1152 Location: Nashville
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: | | Can John trademark the name Goodpasture Confidential, then? |
The trademark that Goodpasture or GOOODPASTURE filed is a state trademark not a federal one. No one at the state reviews the registration to see if it really a trademark. Normally, the question of the validity of a trademark is determined in litigation between two or more users who have commercial interests.
Unless I am just missing it, can anyone point out to me a commercial use of the name Goodpasture on this site?
Last edited by JohnHarris on Fri Sep 28, 2007 1:07 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dottie Guest
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 1:03 pm Post subject: GCS |
|
|
| Goodpasture does use this commerically. They use it on t-shirts or anything that represents Goodpasture, and I feel that they have the right to protect its image. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnHarris Site Admin
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 1152 Location: Nashville
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 1:07 pm Post subject: Re: GCS |
|
|
| Dottie wrote: | | Goodpasture does use this commerically. They use it on t-shirts or anything that represents Goodpasture, and I feel that they have the right to protect its image. |
I do not argue whether Goodpasture's use is commercial or not, under the trademark law that is not the issue here. The issue here and for First Amendment purposes is whether the references to Goodpasture that are made on this site are commercial. If the references on this site are non-commercial then they are not actionable. This is why sites and newsprint which talk about and discuss an entity (e.g., IHateDell.Com) are commonly referred to as "gripe sites" and are generally immune from trademark threats. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 12:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Has anyone from the school asked Harris to take the site down. Seems odd that the school would spend the money on lawyers to fight over this board.
It certainly has been a place for all of us to visit, share ideas, and read about happenings at the school. Personally, I find it interesting to stop by and review the posts. As a parent I want to know what is happening and this site has been refreshing.
My vote is to leave it here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DavidLewis
Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 114
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 8:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: | | Has anyone from the school asked Harris to take the site down. Seems odd that the school would spend the money on lawyers to fight over this board. |
At least indirectly, yes. Earlier this year, I spoke with Gil at length about this. He didn't deny that John had valid questions, but disputed the format (this website) in which he was presenting them.
He specifically asked me not to post (obviously, a request to which I could not, in good conscience, accede ), and said that the site "just needs to be ignored", and the "less people involved, the better".
This was during one of the conversations in which I urged him to sit down with John, man to man, with or without intermediaries, and address the issues John had raised. He refused to do so, saying he was "relying on legal counsel", which advised him not to talk to John.
I gave him the advice my lawyer has given me: leave the lawyers out of it, & work it out between yourselves. He disregarded that advice, as well.
Many of the most important questions and issues raised herein remain unanswered and unaddressed as I write this on Wednesday, 3 October 2007.
David _________________ David Lewis
Class of 1978 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
justme
Joined: 16 Jul 2007 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| David - I really appreciate your insight and knowing Gil's response to your advice. It's another piece of information that adds credibility to the issues raised here. And thank you for taking the time to meet with him face to face. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DavidLewis
Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 114
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Justme--
Just to clarify, it was a phone call (actually, more than one). I haven't seen Gil in person since Homecoming last year. Our conversations were cordial, but I doubt I'd be as well-received now.
It seems I've been dropped from the alumni mailing and e-mail lists. I have yet to receive the "Barbeue" card, nor any of the alumni e-mails I know others have received recently. I received the alumni card last year, & I haven't moved. In fact, I scanned the one I received & sent it out via e-mail in conjunction with a message I sent about the Hamlett Endowment. Gil asked me to do that since I had a more up-to-date alumni e-mail list than did the school.
Maybe I should call Pat & ask about that...
David _________________ David Lewis
Class of 1978 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DavidLewis wrote: | Gil asked me to do that since I had a more up-to-date alumni e-mail list than did the school.
Maybe I should call Pat & ask about that...
David |
Shock!
Amazement!
Wonder!
How you possibly have a more accurate list than the school.
Oh never mind, I forgot we're discussing GCS. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnHarris Site Admin
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 1152 Location: Nashville
|
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| That's right. How hard would it be to get in contact with Alumni and update the list? Not too bad. First, just ask David. Then perhaps put a notice in the Pathfinder which is supposed to be mailed to all of us and ask us to mail in or go "online" (wait a minute, Goodpasture has no real online presence) to update our records. Or, perhaps post-cards to alumni. Perhaps, since Dianne seems to be running the school, Gil can get in his Company Car with a notepad and just start driving around finding us one by one and updating the records manually. Certainly he could handle that with his skill sets. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Goodpasture resorting to threats and attorneys to shut up parents - what a nightmare for those of us to just want to know what is going on. It reminded me of this line
“Oh yeah, they're gonna talk to you, and talk to you, and talk to you about individual freedom, but they see a free individual, it's gonna scare 'em.”
Jack Nicholson in Easy Rider, 1969 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| As an alumni I do not want to see this site taken down until the problems at the school that it is discussing are gone. King George's approach to solving problem was to kill those who discussed them. Is that is what Mr. Drake is trying to do? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cosmic
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 242 Location: North Georgia
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Remember too that both the Pharoah in Moses' day and King Herod (twice) used that approach when told of challenges arising to their authority. _________________ Cosmic.
Class of 1979. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
srl Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 4:36 pm Post subject: Trademark |
|
|
I would think if anyone has a trademark it would be brother B.C.'s family. After all, the school is named for him.
This is all sad, very sad. I had just gone to the web to see about Gilbert Drake's death, and found so much hatred and so many disgruntled people commenting. I pray for Janet and the children.
I know nothing of the facts of what occurred over the last several years. I did not even know anything had taken place. I just stumbled onto this web site about my alma mater.
I wish there were more people who lived up to the ideals of Bro. Brewer and others. Remember the Brewer award??? I don't think many people on this site (maybe including me, too), would qualify.
It's always easy to tear things down...so much harder to build them up.
I have one question. Now that Gilbert has passed, if Goodpasture selects a new (neutral) President, will this web site continue or will these issues be left alone and forgiveness reign in people's hearts?
God forgive all of us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 5:53 pm Post subject: Re: Trademark |
|
|
| srl wrote: | I wish there were more people who lived up to the ideals of Bro. Brewer and others.
I have one question. Now that Gilbert has passed, if Goodpasture selects a new (neutral) President, will this web site continue or will these issues be left alone and forgiveness reign in people's hearts?
God forgive all of us. |
Now that (Brewer) was a tough act to follow.
Actually, srl, this site did not began as the mess that you see. Many of us conversed weekly regarding events at Goodpasture and, believe it or not, most was not negative.
The school did not provide a place for parents to compare notes. They already know what we were to learn; there was a real mess on Due West.
John posted some concerns regarding the behavior of a teacher and the administration's attitude. Now let me tell you that at this point, I had NO problems with the teacher and pressed both John and Gil to work out a solution.
Then another parent reported abuses that the school had pressured into obscurity. We asked on this site about it and were overwhelmed by reports of abuse (both by teachers and students).
I was told about drug use and worse.
I (or rather my son) received porn pictures on his cell phone shot by a GCS student OF a willing GCS student!!!
Gil's response to that was that the girl was forced to do it and it was a closed matter to me. It was not closed as long as that crap kept showing up on my phone!!!!!
Then my family was involved in a sexual assault issue. I was warned by both Gil and Diane that they would have "a dozen people to refute every witness I produced" and "life will be very hard for you at GCS if you pursue this matter".
Diane is the crazy mean one. Gil was just in over his head, afraid of Diane, and ignorant on how to correct the matter.
When the mess is cleaned up, we can go back to discussing ball games and outstanding T-Caps. Meanwhile, we have to face the mess.
Thanks again for reminding me of better times and better people. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
srl Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Like I said, I don't know anything about what you are saying. I do know there were students who drank and used drugs when I was there. That probably happens at every school in America. The cell phone issues weren't a problem -- we didn't have them. I think one problem is that parents give kids access to the internet, cell phones, etc. and then are shocked when they see, receive or send inappropriate things. In our world, unfortunately, these things have to be talked about in the home.
I just wish everyone could get along. I grew up in Madison, went to the Madison church of Christ, knew Bro. Ruhl and his family, knew Gilbert Drake and his family, knew Ms. Smith, Ms. Thomas, Mr. Hamlett, Ms. Evans and so many others. The teachers weren't all perfect when I was there. I personally did not like a few of the teachers. But, I think Jesus calls us all to rise above our own pettiness.
In my humble opinion just seeing this forum for the first time today, I don't see that many commenters are following His example. I see a lot of anger and resentment.
Of course, I could be wrong. I haven't been living this thing for months, like some of you may have been doing.
I do know this - Goodpasture was a good school and overall I liked being there. My parents sacrificed a lot to send me there, and I am thankful to them. I hope things get better for everyone's sake. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
concerned alumnus Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I hate to surprise or shock anyone but I graduated from Goodpasture in the early 80's and some of the same stuff that is being reported going on now went on then such as drug use was very common as was some of the stuff posted about misconduct in the football locker room. My children graduated in the last 5 years and the same stuff was still going on. Smoking pot, drinking beer, sexual misconduct all went on during my time on school campus. During my time and my children's time at GCS Mr. Ruhl was the president and he could not get these same problems under control
This unfortunately is acceptable by society today. We would all like to think that the problems that go on in our public schools do not go on at Goodpasture however they do. And alot of what children do at school they see at home! I pray for whomever is selected as the school's next president because it is very hard to raise children in today's society. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnHarris Site Admin
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 1152 Location: Nashville
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Private school's lose control and discipline options when there is no waiting list. When there is a waiting list, the school can be more selective in the quality of students it accepts and retains. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
concerned alumnus Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Good point Mr. Harris! I would love to know the number of students GCS and DA have lost to JPII The competion is much greater now than ever and GCS must keep up with the JPII of the world |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| concerned alumnus wrote: | | Good point Mr. Harris! I would love to know the number of students GCS and DA have lost to JPII The competition is much greater now than ever and GCS must keep up with the JPII of the world |
I simply can not go the Catholic route for my kids but if that place was Protestant or secular . . . I'd be there in a flash.
Faith is a BIG factor in our house and we simply don't follow the their traditions. But I do some work for them and find JP2's kids amazing.
I new school is working hard to catch up and stay current.
Maybe, someday, GCS will get the message that they can't just keep operating on name alone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnHarris Site Admin
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 1152 Location: Nashville
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is no compelling reason why Goodpasture could not implement many of the same standards academically and achieve the same successes. It may not happen overnight but it could be achieved within a few years.
It will not because the board has no vision - if it did then why the performance gap with JPII? Are we to believe that Catholics are that much smarter? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| What you mean saying Catholics are smarter. Are you that much of a bigot? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: | | What you mean saying Catholics are smarter. Are you that much of a bigot? |
You need to go back AND READ and try to comprehend--he was saying that CATHOLICS ARENT ANY SMARTER its just they have a better administration...DUH!
The Goodpasture educational system did NOT generate very intelligent people-----that is if you even have a high school education |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CO1997 Guest
|
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not that Catholics are smarter...but they have a little more experience with education (2000 years vs. >200 years) - and as you say, better administration. There are weak Catholic schools too...typically, weaker Catholic schools wind up being the ones with a less homogeneous population, i.e., more protestants.
But, as I learned in my Bible class, the CoC claims to have no doctrine or dogma...and with no doctrine or dogma, how could you have a group of students united behind any sort of spiritual purpose? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CO1997 wrote: | Not that Catholics are smarter...but they have a little more experience with education (2000 years vs. >200 years) - and as you say, better administration. There are weak Catholic schools too...typically, weaker Catholic schools wind up being the ones with a less homogeneous population, i.e., more protestants.
But, as I learned in my Bible class, the CoC claims to have no doctrine or dogma...and with no doctrine or dogma, how could you have a group of students united behind any sort of spiritual purpose? |
When I was at Goodpasture as a student I heard the teachers SAY that there was no doctrine or dogma but I can tell you for sure that having attended now 5 different Church of Christ assemblies that they certainly do have both doctrine and dogma. Church of Christ has worked hard to deny that which is evident from their conduct in and outside of the assembly buildings. My brothers in the Church of Christ have worked very hard to earn and preserve the reputation that we have with other denominations and frankly I think most other denominations see Church of Christ for what it is rather than what it thinks it is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Boy did that post ever take a wrong turn:-)
No one ever said Catholics were smarter or dumber.
I know of some Catholic schools that I would not even want my kids to walk past on a dark night.
BUT! At issue was the excellence of JP2.
It is an incredible school and regardless of your view of religious doctrine, its academics set a HIGH mark for any other school to match.
When Diane gets on cable TV during a football halftime and chirps (or hisses) how GCS is superior, she is making a fool out of herself with those that know better.
I settled for a private school with a higher academic standard that GCS but not as high as JP2.
The main deciding factor was Biblical principles DEMONSTRATED daily by the staff and faculty and those same principles expected out of the students. They don't act like GCS where a little preaching is suppose to overlook a day of loose living. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: | | My brothers in the Church of Christ have worked very hard to earn and preserve the reputation that we have with other denominations and frankly I think most other denominations see Church of Christ for what it is rather than what it thinks it is. |
Let me be VERY clear at the beginning that this is NOT a "jump on CoC posting". I have a viewpoint regarding behavior within the local CoC community and welcome a response.
Having been in the CoC I still do not understand the smoke and mirrors approach of telling me that what I saw is not real. And that especially went on at the Madison Church of Christ (try Googling that name) which, I believe carried over to GCS.
There has been an unwritten law that "If you don't agree with our leader, you're damned." "If you can't keep your mouth shut and follow, go away."
I've seen CoC churches split on the least little thing. They'd rather walk away and never speak to each other than sit down at the table, open their Bible, and say "let's fix this thing".
The CoC in Joelton has scattered members into a dozen other churches. Even their former minister and current Bible teacher at GCS (a fine man) got shown the door. He went to Goodlettsville and about a third of the church followed him. He has since remained silent on this issue around the school. How can a man of God not step up and teach us a biblically founded method to repair this mess. Is it the "be quiet and don't rock the boat" mentality of local CoC members.
Madison CoC has a nasty habit of "do as I say not as I do" that goes all the way back to Ira North. Ole Ira use to ride the Metro city counsel like a horse. He preached to the news reporters constantly. But let someone like Mayor Fulton say anything about the church's involvement in politics and Ira would run for that pulpit with the speed of an Olympic sprinter and yell to the high heaven that churches were exempt for government influence.
This very same culture founded and still runs GCS.
Ira had it. Ruhl had it. Gil had it. The board has it. And worst of all, Diane has a perverted version of it.
Forget that a hundred people disagree with you. That is no reason to ever consider their opinion. This culture would much rather have you walk away than to point out their faults. When you do walk away, you should keep your mouth shut and NEVER hang their dirty laundry out in public.
That idea only yields to dollars.
Hundreds of people wrote to the board to keep Gil. Knowing some of those board members and talking to them privately, I know that they never once considered the ability of Gil Drake or potential problems. They only reacted to what they saw as a mass defection from GCS. Issues of the school's vision and foundation were of no interest to them. They only worried about that great green god that they keep in the bank account.
That is why so many "unchristian" remarks get posted on this site; we people that are unhappy and scared of the direction of GCS just won't play by the GCS/CoC rule book. And when we do play by the book, you change the rules. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| AMEN!!!!!!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|